There have been numerous instances in history where people have had to fight oppression. The victories from these ethical battle can be seen through the declarations that were written. These span over hundreds of years, from the Magna Carta in 1512 to our own Declaration of Independence. In essence all these documents convey similar messages. In
class this week we read the Declaration of Sentiments and it made me realize how
ironic this concept of natural rights was.

One way people can be in power is by taking the power away from someone else. By taking away other peoples natural rights they have taken away their only solace of individuality. People get very angered by this, and do so understandably. They believe that if God gave them their rights, then what gives any person- aside from God- the ability to take away this power. And so, they revolt. But they believe they are not fighting for something they need to earn, they are fighting from something that has been taken away.
It would be logical to assume that once someone
has had to fight for their own rights that person would never take away the rights of someone else. For example, if ones parents endured poverty, they would try to ensure their progeny would
never have to experience that life style. Ironically though, the opposite of
this is what happened in America. The American people had to fight for their
rights in a bloody battle to earn their unalienable rights. Almost a hundred
years later, the women of the country did the same, but without the
bloodshed. They drafted their declaration using the same words, but altered some to encompass both men and women, to show how similar their requests were to the
men's. Both groups were asking for the same rights, just at different times. And
even though the men had asked the same to Great Britain they were reluctant to
grant it to the women. And the reason is because, they simply wanted more power.
I love the quote from Adams.
ReplyDeleteNice post, Arushi. I like how you employed many quotes into your piece, and how you used your own logical and ethical appeals in your argument!
ReplyDelete